Muslims For Nader/Camejo

A blog on the Nader/Camejo 2004 Presidential campaigen - exposing the racket of the two corporate parties - with a special focus on issues of concerns for Muslims. This blog is UNOFFICIAL and is NOT endorsed by the official Nader for 2004 presidential campaigen. Blog update daily and several times a day - come back often! Contact: muslimfornader@yahoo.com

Friday, October 22, 2004

An Advanced State of Decay

Again several great articles from Counterpunch:

Alexander Cockburn writes:

We are now witnessing the Democratic Party in very advanced decay. After the Clinton/DLC years, its street cred is conclusively shot. In formal political function the party is nothing much more than an ATM machine, spewing out torrents of cash, supplied by the unions and by corporations seeking favors, to the armies of consultants and operators who have lived off it for decades. Its right wing comprises people who could as easily be in the Republican Party, its center people incapable of standing on any principle. Its left, this season, is made up of the Anybody But Bush crowd, who last spring made the decision to let Kerry be Kerry, without a word of criticism, when he pledged a better war on Iraq and even a march on Tehran.


And if, against most current indications, Kerry wins? He has proffered almost nothing to look forward to, aside from a pledge, which can easily be aborted by a "crisis," to leave Social Security alone. With the Congress against him, he'll be mostly hogtied domestically. On the foreign front he's eagerly hogtied himself. No more compliant serf to the imperatives of Empire and to the government of Israel than Kerry has been visible this season.
A November 3 movement, to pressure Kerry if he wins, rebuild if he loses? Many on the left have argued that. But how will they know which way to march, when they started this year with all the wrong maps?

Read more here


Sharon Smith writes:

Those on the U.S. left who continue to refuse to support Kerry do so not because we cling to "abstract" political purity, but precisely because--like Ali back in February--we understand that both the Democratic and Republican Parties share a common goal in promoting the interests of American "empire" and its "ability to control other parts of the world."

Both candidates stand for more war. Why pretend otherwise? Kerry doesn't. He has repeatedly stated about Iraq, "I want victory. I want to win. And I have a better plan to win than George Bush does." These cannot be interpreted as the words of a peace candidate, despite the tremendous efforts of Kerry's left apologists to imply otherwise.

Kerry is perhaps more virulent than Bush in supporting the Israeli occupation of Palestine, calling Israel "the only true democracy in the Middle East"--despite its ongoing occupation of Palestinian land, and apartheid oppression and ethnic cleansing of Palestinian people. As Kerry wrote in February, "In this difficult time, we must again reaffirm we are enlisted for the duration--and reaffirm our belief that the cause of Israel must be the cause of America."

Kerry also stated during the recent presidential debates, "I support the PATRIOT Act," noting that his running mate, John Edwards, had helped draft it in the Senate. Casting aside Bush's efforts to label him a "liberal," Kerry went on to denounce the Bush administration for allowing "Middle Eastern people" to enter the U.S. without scrutiny.

Read more here

Only one choice this November:

Vote for Ralph Nader and Peter Camejo