Muslims For Nader/Camejo

A blog on the Nader/Camejo 2004 Presidential campaigen - exposing the racket of the two corporate parties - with a special focus on issues of concerns for Muslims. This blog is UNOFFICIAL and is NOT endorsed by the official Nader for 2004 presidential campaigen. Blog update daily and several times a day - come back often! Contact:

Sunday, August 29, 2004

Hypocracy of the Israeli Lobby...

Ralph Nader took an enlightened stand against the pro-Israeli/pro-war lobby/Bush/Kerry... and the ADL / Washington Post smeared him good name.

From John Kerry - Aug 27, 2004:

"Across the Middle East, the United States and Israel are facing a range of crucial security challenges. We are not secure while Saudi donors fund terror, while Iran pursues a nuclear weapons programs and while Syria sponsors terrorist operations. We are not secure while Iraq is at risk of becoming a haven for terrorists. And we are not secure while Israel, the one true democracy in the region, remains the victim of an unrelenting campaign of terror. If we continue without a more effective strategy, we are not supporting our ally as best we can."
"The success of the withdrawal also requires a real Palestinian effort to establish security — to ensure Gaza does not remain a haven for terrorists to launch attacks on Israel. Experience has made very clear that for the Palestinians to meet this key test, new Palestinian leadership is required, as Yasser Arafat has proven himself not to be a partner for peace."
"My commitment to a safe and secure Jewish state is unwavering. For 19 years, this is a pledge I have kept in the United States Senate — whether through my votes on economic aid, military security or the location of the U.S. Embassy. And it is one I will continue to keep as I lead a bold new effort to enhance regional security throughout the Middle East."

Today pro-Israeli lobbyists are pounding the war drum more feverishly than ever, and many Americans are jamming to the beat. In the September issue, Steve Forbes's "Fact and Comment" (page 33 - first 'Fair and Balanced,' now this) - he paints Iran as a county whose sole purpose is to harm Israel with nuclear arms. Some statements made by Forbes:

"Israel has long considered Iran's black-robed fascists to be it's ultimate enemy." "...We should make clear to Tehran that continued nuclearization will mean the U.S. will back any Israeli response to the hilt. Furthermore, we will strike, perhaps even before the Israelis do." "...Nukes mean respect, mean security - and they grant blackmail power to shake down billions in booty from the U.S. and other Western moneybags."

These sickly naive assumptions prove how little respect Forbes has for his own readers. Iran's nukes to shake down billions in booty? Iran has how much oil?
Maybe Kuwait and Qatar should shake down western money bags as-well. Israel/Egypt/Jordan's annual shakedown is sadly neglected by Forbes. Using his logic: It's time for Rwanda to make a nuke and shake down some well needed booty. Haiti, Uganda, Somalia - Axis of the Truly Needy.

Forbes/Kerry make it sound like Israel is America's 51st state. Or 1st state, depending on how you look at it. AIPAC has put up a statement on it's site insisting no connection to the suspected Israeli spy nested within the top-levels of the Pentagon - an Iran analyst. On AIPAC's site is the following:

In the wake of Iran's nearly 20 years of secret development of nuclear weapons and ongoing efforts to
undermine the work of U.N. arms inspectors, Congress has passed legislation aimed at halting Tehran's nuclear program. The Senate unanimously passed a resolution condemning Iran's failure to adhere to International Atomic Energy Agency agreements and continuing efforts to develop a nuclear capability. This resolution (S. Con. Res. 81), introduced by Sens. Jon Kyl (R-AZ), Dianne Feinstein (D-CA), Richard Lugar (R-IN), and Joseph Biden (D-DE), urges the U.N. Security Council "to address the threat tointernational peace and security posed by Iran's nuclear weapons program and take such action as may be necessary." Earlier this year, the House passed similar legislation calling upon signatories of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, including the United States, to use all appropriate means to deter, dissuade, and prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons. Thank your Senators and House members for supporting these resolutions.

You're welcome AIPAC. The hypocrisy of Forbes/Kerry and AIPAC. If Iran obtains nuclear weapons, you can bet they won't match the SECRET 200 WMD ATOMIC ARSENAL of what Vanunnu described as "holocaust bombs" - including hydrogen and neutron bombs. Israel has never admitted to or signed proliferation treaties for these WMDs. AIPAC states Iran "undermines the U.N." as Israel's own WMDs, and it's Dimona Reactor are permanently closed to inspectors.

Israel is the only nuclear nation in the Middle-East, and it wants to keep it that way. Has any nuclear country in the world been invaded? If Iraq had nukes, would Bush have been able to occupy it? Peter Camejo noted each Iraqi family is worth $6 Million dollars in Iraqi oil, when will they get it? What is each Iranian family worth? Have Americans lost the ability to empathize with people of different cultures and faiths? If America & Israel are justified in defending themselves. Why not Iran? Are Americans and Israelis superior to Iranians, or are all humans equal?

You can only really waste a vote by not voting Nader/Camejo on November 2, 2004!

Do you really want to waste a vote on this guy?